The Influence of Mind Mapping and Jigsaw Type Learning Models in Differentiated Learning on Learning Outcomes of Life Cycle Materials

Authors

  • Diyah Dwi Wijayanti Universitas Muria Kudus, Indonesia
  • Sri Utaminingsih Universitas Muria Kudus, Indonesia
  • Wawan Shokib Rondli Universitas Muria Kudus, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53797/icccmjssh.v3i4.12.2024

Keywords:

learning mind mapping, Jigsaw, Learning outcomes

Abstract

Research objectives: to analyze 1) the effect of the mind mapping type learning model on learning outcomes of the Living Cycle Materials, 2) the effect of the jigsaw type learning model on the Learning Outcomes of the Living Cycle Materials, 3) analyze the differences in the influence of the mind mapping and jigsaw type learning models on learning outcomes Life Cycle Material.Learning is a series of events that are complex and systematic. In this incident, there was interaction between educators and students in the context of changing attitudesand thought patterns that became habits as students. Learning and teaching are two activities that accur simultaneously, but have different meanings, as stated by Suherman (2003) that “teaching events are always accompanied by learning events, there are teachers who teach and there are also students who learn.This research method is quasi- experimental. Data collection techniques using tests, questionnaires and documents. The data analysis technique used is validity test, reliability test, normality test, homogeneity test, average similarity test, discriminatory test and N gain.The results of the study (1) There is an influence of the mind mapping learning model on learning out comes of Life Cycle Materials based on a tcount of 9.633 > ttable of 2.04841. (2) There is an influence of the jigsaw model on learning outcomes of Living Cycle based on tcount 20.602 > ttable 2.05954. (3) There are differences in the influence of the jigsaw and mind mapping type learning models on learning outcomes based on the value in experiment 1, which is 80.44 and experiment 2, which is 90.37. Thus, the influence of the mind mapping model is better than jigsaw model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agus Suprijono. 2010.Cooperative Learning: PAIKEM Theory and Applications, Yogyakarta: Student Library.

Anita Lie. (2015) Cooperative Learning; Practicing Cooperative Learning in Classrooms, Jakarta: Gramedia.

Arends, (2011), Learning to Teach, volume 2, Yogyakarta. Study library. Basiruddin Usman. (2012). Islamic Learning Methodology.Jakarta: Ciputat Press. Buzan, T. (2013). Mind Map Smart Book. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama Dimyati & Mudjiono. 2013.Learning And Learning.Jakarta: Rineka. Hamruni,

(2012), Learning strategies,Yogyakarta: Insan Madani.

Ission. 2010.Cooperative Learning Develops Group Learning Ability.Banfung: Alphabet.

John Holt, “Jigsaw: Tips on Implementation”, http://www.jigsaw.org/tips.htm, accessed on August 28 2020

Mel Silberman. 2013. Active Learning 101 Strategies for active teaching. West Jakarta: PT Index.

Noor, Juliansyah. 2015.Research Methodology, Theses, Theses, Dissertations & Scientific Work, (Jakarta: Prenadamedia group)

Oemar Hamalik. 2014. Psychology of Learning and Teaching. Bandung: New Rays. Algensindo.

Purwanto, Ngalim. 2018. Evaluation of Learning Outcomes. Yogyakarta, Student Library.

Ridwan Abdullah Sani, 2016.Learning Innovation.Jakarta; Earth of Letters. Rusman, 2012.Learning Models, Developing Teacher Professionalism,Bandung:

PT Raja Grafindo Persada

Slavin. Robert. E. 2019. Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice. Lita translation.Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice. 2005. Bandung: Nusa Media.

Sudjana, Nana. 2014.Basics of the Teaching and Learning Process. Bandung: Sinar.

New Algensido.

Slameto. 2010.Learning and Factors that influence it. Jakarta: Rineka. Create. Siberrnen, Mel. 2014. 101 Active Learning Strategies (Active Learning). Bandung: Nusa Media.

Susanna Abbott. 2013.Mind Map Illustration Book.Jakarta: Kompas Gramedia. Sugiyono. 2012.Qualitative, Quantitative, R&D Research Methods.Yogyakarta:

Rineka Cipta.

Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih. 2013.Educational Research Methods.Bandung: Rosda Karya Youth.

Taniredja, Tukiran., et al. 2011.Innovative Learning Models.Bandung: ALFABETA.

Trianto. 2017.Constructivist Oriented Innovative Learnin Models.Jakarta: Library Achievement.

Tony Buzan,The Ultimate Book Of Mind Map(Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2017),

Windura, S. 2016. Mind Map Step by Step. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo

Downloads

Published

2024-08-03

How to Cite

Diyah, D. W. ., Utaminingsih, S. ., & Rondli, W. S. . (2024). The Influence of Mind Mapping and Jigsaw Type Learning Models in Differentiated Learning on Learning Outcomes of Life Cycle Materials. ICCCM Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(4), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.53797/icccmjssh.v3i4.12.2024

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2