The Influence of Mind Mapping and Jigsaw Type Learning Models in Differentiated Learning on Learning Outcomes of Life Cycle Materials

Abstract

Research objectives: to analyze 1) the effect of the mind mapping type learning model on learning outcomes of the Living Cycle Materials, 2) the effect of the jigsaw type learning model on the Learning Outcomes of the Living Cycle Materials, 3) analyze the differences in the influence of the mind mapping and jigsaw type learning models on learning outcomes Life Cycle Material.Learning is a series of events that are complex and systematic. In this incident, there was interaction between educators and students in the context of changing attitudesand thought patterns that became habits as students. Learning and teaching are two activities that accur simultaneously, but have different meanings, as stated by Suherman (2003) that “teaching events are always accompanied by learning events, there are teachers who teach and there are also students who learn.This research method is quasi- experimental. Data collection techniques using tests, questionnaires and documents. The data analysis technique used is validity test, reliability test, normality test, homogeneity test, average similarity test, discriminatory test and N gain.The results of the study (1) There is an influence of the mind mapping learning model on learning out comes of Life Cycle Materials based on a tcount of 9.633 > ttable of 2.04841. (2) There is an influence of the jigsaw model on learning outcomes of Living Cycle based on tcount 20.602 > ttable 2.05954. (3) There are differences in the influence of the jigsaw and mind mapping type learning models on learning outcomes based on the value in experiment 1, which is 80.44 and experiment 2, which is 90.37. Thus, the influence of the mind mapping model is better than jigsaw model.