Analysis of Implementation of the Independent Curriculum in Kudus District

Authors

  • Susanti Faculty of Teacher Training and Education. Universitas Muria Kudus, Indonesia
  • Su'ad Faculty of Teacher Training and Education. Universitas Muria Kudus, Indonesia
  • Gumnawan Setiadi Faculty of Teacher Training and Education. Universitas Muria Kudus, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53797/icccmjssh.v3i4.3.2024

Keywords:

Independent Curriculum Analysis, CIPP, Independent Learning

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the implementation of the Independent Curriculum for the 2022/2023 Academic Year at Gugus Kaliyitno Elementary School, Dawe District, Kudus Regency, with research subjects consisting of 4 schools. In analyzing the implementation of the independent curriculum using the CIPP evaluation model (Context, Input, Process, and Product). This research is evaluative research with descriptive qualitative method. Data collection techniques used are interviews, questionnaires, observation and documentation studies. Data analysis uses the Miles and Hubberman flow with the stages of data reduction, data presentation and drawing conclusions from data obtained in the field. The results showed that context evaluation with indicators of curriculum suitability with the school's vision and mission, curriculum suitability with student learning needs and curriculum suitability with the times showed good results. Evaluation of input with indicators of understanding KOSP is 50% good and 50% sufficient, Completeness of Teaching Modules is 100% good, Completeness of Infrastructure is 50% good and 50% sufficient, while indicators for setting lesson hours are 100% good. Evaluation of the process with indicators of the implementation of learning differs 75% in the sufficient category and 25% in the good category, 75% of P5 learning implementation is in the good category and 25% is in the sufficient category, while the implementation of assessment in learning is 50% in the good category and 50% in sufficient category. Product evaluation with indicators of student learning outcomes is 100% in the good category and 100% student satisfaction is in the satisfied category.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ambiyar dan D. Muharika. 2019. Metodologi Penelitian Evaluasi Program. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Anggraena, Y., Felicia, N., Ginanto, D. E., Pratiwi, I., Utama, B., Alhapip, L., Widiaswati, D. 2021. Kajian Akademik : Kurikulum untuk Pemulihan Pembelajaran. Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan. Kementrian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

Asri, M. 2017.Dinamika Kurikulum di Indonesia. MODELING. Vol. 4. No. 2 Azhari, M. F., & Heldayani, S. 2021. The Relationship of Anxiety Level With

Length of Stay Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Patient ‘s in Special Quarantine Bapelkes Banjarbaru. Journal of Nursing and Health Education, 1(1), 30-37.

Aziz, S., Mahmood, M., & Rehman, Z. 2018. Implementation of CIPP Model for Quality Evaluation at School Level: A Case Study. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(1), 189-206.

Barlian, U. C., & Solekah, S. 2022. Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan. JOEL: Journal of Educational and Language Research, 1(12), 2105–2118.

Budiarti, N. 2022. Merdeka mengajar platform as a support for the quality of Mathematics learning in East Java. Matematika Dan Pembelajaran, diakses 19 April 2023. https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/ documents/detail/2840278

Dakir. 2004. Perencanaan Dan Pengembangan Kurikulum, cet I. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Darodjat, D., & Wahyudhiana, W. (2015). Model evaluasi program pendidikan. Islamadina: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 1-23

Faiz, A., & Faridah. 2022. Program Guru Penggerak Sebagai Sumber Belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran. 14(1), 2442–2355.

Fitzpatrick, J. L. 2011. Program evaluationalternative approaches and practical guidelines (No. 379.154097 F5)

Hamalik, O. 2017. Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Harahap, Muhammad Syahril, dkk. 2020. Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Siswa Melaksanakan Pembelajaran secara Daring Selama Masa Pandemi Covid- 19, Jurnal Mathedu.

Keputusan Mendikbudristek No 262 / M / 2022 Tentang Perubahan Keputusan Mendikbudristek No 56/M/2022 Tentang Pedoman Penerapan Kurikulum Dalam Rangka Pumulihan Pembelajaran.

Lismina. 2019. Pengembangan kurikulum di Sekolah dan Perguruan Tinggi. Jawa Timur: Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia

Muryadi, A. D. 2017. Model evaluasi program dalam penelitian evaluasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Penjas (Penelitian, Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran), 3(1).

Musfah, Jejen. 2016. Tips Menulis Karya Ilmiah Makalah, Penelitian, Skripsi, Tesis & Disertasi. Jakarta : Kencana Prenadamedia Group.

Sholeh, Hidayat. 2013. engembangan Kurikulum Baru. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono. 2016. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta

Downloads

Published

2024-07-28

How to Cite

Susanti, Su’ad, & Setiadi, G. (2024). Analysis of Implementation of the Independent Curriculum in Kudus District. ICCCM Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(4), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.53797/icccmjssh.v3i4.3.2024