The Influence of the Guru Penggerak Program on Teacher Competency and Performance

M. N. Secha; G.  Setiadi; S. Utaminingsih

doi:10.53797/icccmjssh.v5i4.9.2026

Authors

M. N. Secha University of Muria Kudus, Indonesia
G. Setiadi University of Muria Kudus, Indonesia
S. Utaminingsih University of Muria Kudus, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53797/icccmjssh.v5i4.9.2026

Keywords:

Guru Penggerak Program, Teacher Competency, Teacher Performance

Abstract

The objectives of this study are: (1) to examine the influence of the Guru Penggerak program on teacher competency, (2) to examine the influence of the Guru Penggerak program on teacher performance, and (3) to examine the influence of the Guru Penggerak program on both teacher competency and teacher performance. This research uses a quantitative approach. It is categorized as ex post facto research and applies a descriptive correlational method. The sample consisted of 127 respondents, selected using a purposive sampling technique. The data collected through questionnaires were analyzed using SEM. The results of the study show that (1) The output of the 4-fit measurement model for the exogenous variable (Guru Penggerak program) shows a C.R. value ≥ 1.967 and a probability (P) value ≤ 0.05, thus H0 is rejected (the research hypothesis is accepted). This means the exogenous variable (Guru Penggerak program) has a direct influence on its endogenous variable, namely teacher competency. (2) The output of the 4-fit measurement model for the exogenous variable (Guru Penggerak program) shows a C.R. value ≤ 1.967 and a probability (P) value ≥ 0.05, thus H0 is accepted (the research hypothesis is rejected). This indicates that the Guru Penggerak program does not have a direct influence on the endogenous variable, namely teacher performance. (3) Based on the output of the significance of mediation (Sobel test), the two-tailed probability value was ≤ 0.05, therefore H0 is rejected (the research hypothesis is accepted). This finding supports the acceptance of the third hypothesis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Fatimatuzzahroh, F. S., & Z, E. (2023). Peran guru penggerak dalam meningkatkan kualitas kinerja guru di SDN 1 Mulyoharjo. Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal, 4(3), 2122–2129.

Husni. (2022). Pengaruh pendidikan guru penggerak dan kompetensi kepemimpinan terhadap kompetensi manajerial guru penggerak SMP di Kabupaten Lombok Barat [Tesis/Disertasi]. Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram.

Murniarti, E. (2021). Analisis kompetensi pedagogik guru pada pembelajaran daring di masa pandemi Covid-19. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(4), 1418–1427.

Purwanto, I. (2019). Upaya meningkatkan kompetensi guru dalam proses pembelajaran berdasarkan kurikulum 2013 melalui supervisi akademik semester satu tahun pelajaran 2017/2018 di SMP Negeri 9 Mataram. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 5(1), 286–296.

Royani, I., Happy, F., & Rohana. (2020). Pengaruh kepemimpinan kepala PAUD dan kompetensi guru terhadap kinerja guru. Journal of Innovation in Teaching and Instructional Media, 1(1), 36–45.

Satriawan, S., Satriawan, I. D., & Amin, N. (2021). Guru penggerak dan transformasi sekolah dalam kerangka inkuiri apresiatif. Al-Idarah: Jurnal Kependidikan Islam, 11(1).

Siregar, S., et al. (2021). Structural equation modeling konsep dan implementasinya pada kajian ilmu manajemen dengan menggunakan Amos. CV Budi Utama.

Sodik, N., Fitri, O., & Muhammad, W. A. (2021). Strategi meningkatkan kinerja guru pendidikan agama islam melalui program guru penggerak. AL-WIJDÁN: Journal of Islamic Education Studies, 6(2), 136–149.

Sugiyono. (2016). Statistik untuk penelitian. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian administrasi. Alfabeta.

Yokoyama, Y., Nadeak, B., & Sihotang, H. (2022). Implementasi kompetensi guru penggerak dalam menerapkan merdeka belajar SMK di Tana Toraja. Jurnal Dinamika Pendidikan, 16(2), 187–200.