Application of Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM) in Development of the Heutagogical and Technological Practices in Next Generation Learning Spaces (NGLS) Framework

Sanura Jaya; Rozniza  Zaharudin; Muhammad Nidzam  Yaakob; Muhammad Azlan  Ithnin

doi:10.53797/icccmjssh.v1i2.5.2022

Authors

Sanura Jaya Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, MALAYSIA
Rozniza Zaharudin Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, 11800, MALAYSIA
Muhammad Nidzam Yaakob Institut Pendidikan Guru, Kampus Darulaman, Jitra, 06000, MALAYSIA
Muhammad Azlan Ithnin Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, 11800, MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53797/icccmjssh.v1i2.5.2022

Keywords:

Next generation learning spaces, technology tools, Fuzzy Delphi Method, heutagogy

Abstract

The usability of suitable pedagogical strategies and activities in the classroom is a vital key in Malaysian education. Teachers need the transition from the conventional pedagogical approaches to digitalization approaches with student-centred. The teacher should move faster from the pedagogy, andragogy to the heutagogy approach, focusing on technology integration in teaching and learning. The Fuzzy Delphi Method is used in this article to develop heutagogical and technological practises in Next Generation Learning Spaces (FDM). Thirteen experts in curriculum, pedagogical and technology are involved in this research. The threshold value for the accepted elements for pedagogy strategies is 0.133, and the value (d) construct is 0.153 for teaching and learning activities. Hence the value (d) construct for the online tutorial is 0.050 and for online learning, the value (d) construct is 0.177. Therefore, the threshold value described the (d) value is lower than 0.2 (d ≤ 0.2), which shows the acceptable elements indicator in FDM. The overall findings demonstrated the experts' consensus range between 75% to 100%. The α-cut value for acceptable elements also shows ≥ 0.5, a range value between 0.792 and 0.967. The defuzzification process will shift the ranking of the elements in developing the NGLS framework in teachers' pedagogy and technological practices. This research definitely creates a new transition in heutagogical and technological practices for Next Generation Learning Spaces to enhance education in the digital age.

Keywords: Next generation learning spaces, technology tools, Fuzzy Delphi Method, heutagogy

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abidin, Z., & Saputro, T. M. E. (2020). Google Classroom as a Mathematics Learning Space: Potentials and Challenges. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/2/022094

Ahmad Alif Kamal, Norhunaini Mohd Shaipullah, Liyana Truna, Muna Sabri, & Syahrul N. Junaini. (2020). Transitioning to online learning during COVID-19 Pandemic: Case study of a Pre-University Centre in Malaysia. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(6), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2020.0110628

Analisa Hamdan, Wong, K.-T., & Nor Syazwani Mat Salleh. (2021). M-Heutagogy Acceptance among Students of Higher Education Institutions: The Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i6/10392

Azlina Musa, Mohd Nasir Hashim, Nurul Ain Chua Abdullah, & Rabiu Mu’azu Musa. (2021). Use of computer technology in the Internet using the youtube in teaching and learning student basic technique dances contemporary University of Malaysia Terengganu. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1793(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1793/1/012032

Blaschake, L. (2021). Heutagogy: The pedagogy of agency. Pacific Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.24135/pjtel.v3i1.110

Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. In International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning (Vol. 13, Issue 1, pp. 56–71). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1076

Canning, N. (2010). Playing with heutagogy: Exploring strategies to empower mature learners in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 34(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770903477102

Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002

Dewantara, & Dibia. (2021). The principles of blended learning design with heutagogy approach thourgh e-ganesha moodle in Indonesian language learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1810(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1810/1/012048

Edwards, B. I., Nurbiha A.Shukor, & Cheok, A. D. (2021). Emerging Technologies for Next Generation Learning Spaces. Springer Nature Singapore.

Fadzilah Bee Abdul Rahman, Zaida Mustafa, & Azrul Fazwan Kharuddin. (2021). Employing Fuzzy Delphi Technique to Validate Multiple Intelligence Based Instructional Teaching Module For Preschool Children. 10(1), 62–71.

Fraser, K. (2014). The Future of Learning and Teaching in Next Generation Learning Spaces (M. Tight, Ed.; First Edition). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Galway, G. J., Maddigan, B., & Stordy, M. (2020). Teacher Educator Experiences of iPad Integration in Pre-Service Teacher Education: Successes and Challenges. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(5), 557–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1819397

Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2007). Heutagogy: A Child of Complexity Theory. An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 4(1), 111–118. www.complexityandeducation.ca

Hedberg, J. G., & Ho, J. (2012). Teachers as designers of learning environments. In Classroom Integration of Type II Uses of Technology in Education (pp. 145–158). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1300/J025v22n03_12

Hensley, N. (2020). Teacher Perceptions of Blended Learning to Support 21st Century Learners.

Hidayat, B., & Shafie, M. (2020). Pelaksanaan PdPc Dalam Talian (OLL) Semasa Perintah Kawalan Pergerakan (PKP) Fasa 1 Dan 2 Covid-19 (Implementation of PdPc OLL during COVID-19 Movement Control Order Phase 1 and 2). Myjms.Moe.Gov.My, 2(2), 213–221. http://myjms.moe.gov.my/index.php/jdpd

Hultum, I. (2009). Heutagogy and e-learning in the workplace: some challenges and opportunities. Journal of Applied Research in Workplace E-Learning, 1(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.5043/impact.13

Ishak, N. A., & Jamil, H. (2020). Pedagogies towards enhancing students' intellectual capital in Malaysian secondary schools. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 35(2), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.21315/apjee2020.35.2.4

Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., and E. (2014). Technology for outlook International schools in Asia : A horizon project regional report. 1–28. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED559372

Kadek, N., Listiani, M., Komang, N., Suwastini, A., Dantes, G. R., Luh, N., Sri, P., Agung, I. G., & Rwa, S. (2021). YouTube as Digital Learning Resources for Teaching Bilingual Young Learners. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Technology and Educational Science (ICTES 2020), 540(Ictes 2020), 156–162. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/ictes-20/125955262

Kamarudin Ismail, Rosnah Ishak, & Siti Hajar Kamaruddin. (2021). Development of Professional Learning Communities Model using Fuzzy Delphi Approach. TEM Journal, 10(2), 873–878. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM102-48

Kenyon, C., & Hase, S. (2001). Moving from andragogy to heutagogy in vocational education. Proceedings of the Australian Vocational Education and Training Research Association (AVETRA) 4th Conference , 1–9.

Keppell, M. (2014). Personalized Learning Strategies for Higher Education Personalised Learning Strategies for Higher Education Learning in Ubiquitous Spaces. International Perspectives on Higher Education Research, 1–12. https://eprints.usq.edu.au/25679/1/Keppell_2014.pdf

Khaydarova, U., & Uz, U. X. (2020). The Use Of Interactive Technologies And Methods In Online Practical Lessons In Uzbekistan During Covid-19 Pandemic. 07(03), 3941–3947.

Langdon Warren, L. (2021). The Importance of Teacher Leadership Skills in the Classroom. Education Journal, 10(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20211001.12

McLoughlin, C. E. (2013). The pedagogy of personalized learning: exemplars, MOOCS and related learning theories. Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2013(1), 266–270. http://www.editlib.org/p/111968/

Ministry of Education. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 - 2025. Ministry of Education Malaysia, 27(1), 1–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007

Mohd Ridhuan Mohd Jamil, & Nurul Rabihah Mat Noh. (2020). Kepelbagaian Metodologi dalam Penyelidikan Reka Bentuk dan Pembangunan (Izra Noh, Ed.; second edition). Qaisar Prestige Resources.

Muhamad Khairul, A., Adnan, A. H., Yusof, A. A., Kamal, M. A., & Kamal, N. N. (2019). Using New Technologies to Teach English in Malaysia - Issues and Challenges. Proceedings: International Invention, Innovative & Creative (InIIC) Conference, 2019, 2019, 203–207.

Muhammad Nidzam Yaakob. (2016). Pembangunan Model Kurikulum M-Pembelajaran Teknologi dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran di IPG. Universiti Utara Malaysia.

M.Yaqoob Koondhar, Muniba Memon, Ali Raza Rang, & Asadullah Shah. (2021). Pervasive Learning Environment for Educational Makerspaces with Emerging Technologies and Teaching and Learning Transformation. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 10(3), 2272–2277. https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatcse/2021/1111032021

Nambiar, R. M. K., Noor, N. M., Kemboja Ismail, & Shahirah Adam. (2018). The Impact of New Learning Spaces on Teacher Pedagogy and Student Learning Behavior. INTED2018 Proceedings, 1(June 2019), 8132–8135. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2018.1969

Narayan, V., & Herrington, J. (2014). Towards a theoretical mobile heutagogy framework. ASCILITE 2014, The Rhetoric and Reality: Critical Perspectives on Educational Technology , Dunedin.

Nurbanati, E., Hariri, H., Rini, R., Sowiyah, S., & Perdana, R. (2021). The Use of Mobile Device in the School for Learning and Teaching System a Literature Review. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.16-10-2020.2305207

Nurul Rabihah Mat Noh, Saedah Siraj, Siti Hajar Halili, Mohd Ridhuan Mohd Jamil, & Zaharah Husin. (2019). Application of Fuzzy Delphi Method as a Vital Element in Technology as a Tool in Design Thinking Based Learning. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 34, 129–151. https://doi.org/10.21315/apjee2019.34.7

Paniagua, A., & Istance, D. (2018). Teachers as Designers of Learning Environments. The Importance of Innovative Pedagogies. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, OECD.

Porman Lumban Gaol. (2020). Literature Study: The Transformation of Post-Pendemic Learning Methods from Pedagogy, Andragogy to Heutagogy. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Ilmu Administrasi 4.0, 187–192.

Qismullah Yusuf, & Yunisrina Qismullah Yusuf. (2018). Digital Culture and Digitagogy: A Life of a Digital Culturalist and a Digitagogist. Proceeding of the International Conference on the Roles of Parents in Shaping Children's Characters (ICECED), 7–14.

Radcliffe, D., Wilson, H., Powell, D., & Tibbetts, B. (2008). Designing next generation places of learning: Collaboration at the pedagogy-space-technology nexus. The University of Queensland, 1–20. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.215.788&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Ramlan Mustapha, M. Fairus Jafar, M. Muzakkir Othman, M. Kamal Jusoh, & Nur Shahira Ibrahim. (2021). The Development of I-Cylearn Framework in Online Digital Learning in Higher Education: The Fuzzy Delphi Method Study. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(4), 412–428. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i4/9681

Richey, R., & Klein, J. (2007). Design and Development Research.

Saedah Siraj, Muhammad Ridhuan Tony Lim Abdullah, & Rozaini Muhamad Rozkee. (2021). Pendekatan Penyelidikan Rekabentuk dan Pembangunan: Vol. Volume 2. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris .

Sage, K., Piazzini, M., Downey, J. C., & Ewing, S. (2020). Flip It or Click It: Equivalent Learning of Vocabulary From Paper, Laptop, and Smartphone Flashcards. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(2), 145–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520943647

Sanura Jaya, Rozniza Zaharudin, & Muhammad Nidzam Yaakob. (2022). Development of Technology Tools in Next Generation Learning Spaces (Ngls) Framework: a Fuzzy Delphi Analysis. International Journal of Special Education, Special Issue on World of Education and Rehabilitation, Vol.37(3s), 316–331.

Şentürk, C. (2020). Effects of the blended learning model on preservice teachers' academic achievements and twenty-first century skills. Education and Information Technologies, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10340-y

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism as a Learning Theory for the Digital Age. Www.Itdl.Org.Journal, 1–9. http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm

Sukor Beram, Marinah Awang, Ramlee Ismail, & Norzalina Noor. (2021). Aplikasi Fuzzy Delphi Method Terhadap Kompetensi Kepimpinan Organisasi Bagi Pemimpin Pertengahan Pendidikan. Management Research Journal, 10(Special Issue), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.37134/mrj.vol10.sp.7.2021

Syed Lamsah Syed Chear, & Muhamad Yusoff Mohd Nor. (2020). Learning Intervention in e-Learning Portal Through WhatsApp and Telegram Based on Needham Five Phase Model. Evaluation Studies in Social Sciences, Vol.9, 11–27.

Yaakob, M. F. M., Nawi, A., Yusof, M. R., Fauzee, M. S. O., Awang, H., Khun-Inkeeree, H., Pozin, M. A. A., & Habibi, A. (2020). A quest for experts' consensus on the Geo-education module using Fuzzy Delphi analysis. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080748